BLURRING | LINES

Dispatches from the fence that used to separate science journalism from science pr

Skip to content

Home
About this blog
Global survey outcomes
Contact

200216_AAAS2020_Blurringlines_Powerpoint

200216_AAAS2020_Blurringlines_Powerpoint

This entry was posted on 11 March, 2020 by Peter Vermij.

Post navigation

← 200216_AAAS2020_Blurringlines_Powerpoint

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search for:

Most recent posts

Journalism federations moonlighting as PR agents 9 March, 2020
A debate on conflicts of interest in science journalism 16 February, 2020
All-expenses-paid trips may help blur the lines 25 November, 2019
‘Wanted: ethical guidelines for freelancers’ 12 August, 2019
Lines protecting ‘science journalism’ remain blurry 13 October, 2018
Some NASW members attempt to draw firm lines 9 October, 2018
Line-blurring in Australia 31 May, 2018
‘The dilemma facing journalism’ 9 November, 2016
Who are those ‘non-bona fide science journalists’? 25 October, 2016
Testing blurry lines between journalists and others 1 July, 2016
Blurred lines defining Canadian science ‘journalists’ 1 June, 2016
A looming rift in science journalism? 27 May, 2016
US survey echoes global survey on blurring lines 19 May, 2016
A request for a clear definition of science journalism 30 December, 2015
‘Where do science journalists draw the line?’ 23 November, 2015
The demise of science journalism? 5 November, 2015
‘On Science Journalism And Conflicts Of Interest’ 21 October, 2015
Kavli/WFSJ symposium seeks definition of science journalism 10 April, 2014
Nature: independent science journalism needed 11 July, 2013

Recent comments

Archive

March 2020
February 2020
November 2019
August 2019
October 2018
May 2018
November 2016
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
April 2014
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
January 2013

CONTACT

Mail us at mail@blurringlines.org

Proudly powered by WordPress